Notices
Motor Sports If you like rallying, road racing, autoxing, or track events, then this is the spot for you.

2024 SCCA SOLO - STU Discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 14, 2023, 11:11 AM
  #31  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (2)
 
ViciousLSD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,943
Received 385 Likes on 330 Posts
Originally Posted by CaptainSquirts
2 weekends ago I smacked a cone during one of my autocross runs. It somehow hit the oil cooler and damaged it. Lost about a quart of oil after like 3 minutes of being on grid it spewing oil. Had to get towed. Since I kept my oem one after installing this aftermarket one, I was able to swapped it out ez pz and run again this latest weekend which I was able to snag 1st in pax and 2nd raw.
sigh AN fittings. If you need to get another one, get something with endcaps and low profile inlets then use banjos

Old Dec 15, 2023, 01:45 PM
  #32  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
CaptainSquirts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Brandon, Florida
Posts: 774
Received 54 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by RobbieOh
Man, never thought a cone would take out an oil cooler.. sheesh.
😆 I know right? I initially thought it was someone else’s car that leaked a bunch of oil where I parked, then realization set in 🫠.
Old Dec 15, 2023, 01:49 PM
  #33  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
CaptainSquirts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Brandon, Florida
Posts: 774
Received 54 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by ViciousLSD
sigh AN fittings. If you need to get another one, get something with endcaps and low profile inlets then use banjos

Gonna stick with the OEM oil cooler. The OEM one overall felt way sturdier than the STM oil cooler setup. If the oem one ever goes south, then maybe I’ll go the Setrab route if it’s actually on par or better than OEM.
Old Dec 15, 2023, 02:58 PM
  #34  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (2)
 
ViciousLSD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,943
Received 385 Likes on 330 Posts
Originally Posted by CaptainSquirts
Gonna stick with the OEM oil cooler. The OEM one overall felt way sturdier than the STM oil cooler setup. If the oem one ever goes south, then maybe I’ll go the Setrab route if it’s actually on par or better than OEM.
you dont need brand names, just features, like the inlets and dimensions, so that it can be mounted like OE. mounting it both inlets pointing downwards is not good
The following users liked this post:
CaptainSquirts (Dec 15, 2023)
Old Dec 15, 2023, 09:44 PM
  #35  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 15,756
Received 1,543 Likes on 1,322 Posts
Originally Posted by CaptainSquirts
Gonna stick with the OEM oil cooler. The OEM one overall felt way sturdier than the STM oil cooler setup. If the oem one ever goes south, then maybe I’ll go the Setrab route if it’s actually on par or better than OEM.
The OEM cooler is, very honestly, a better piece than the B&M coolers.

The Setrab is definitely an upgrade though. Depending on power output they can over cool the oil.
Old Jan 2, 2024, 12:59 PM
  #36  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (36)
 
LV///R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: US
Posts: 1,538
Received 194 Likes on 115 Posts
I would love clarification to my 4 point Autopower roll bar situation. This is one of the changes I was looking to make for the 2024 season for mainly track, but possibly the added rigidity for autox. I added plates at the base/floor as well, knowing how flimsy that is as well.

I removed the rear seats completely as there's no way to make it fit, unless you hack up the rear seat from what I gather and I'd like to NOT cut them.

Here's what the rules say:

SCCA Street roll bar/cage rules

"13. Street Category Section 3.3.3.B.1, Safety Inspection Requirements. G. Roll Bars and Roll Cages 1. Roll bars and roll cages may be added. Roll bars may be welded or bolted in. Roll bars must meet the requirements of section 3.3.2. Standard rollover hoops, covers, trim panels interior parts and rear seats may be removed or modified for clearance. Holes may be added to the chassis to allow installation but may serve no other purpose. Factory seatbelts and airbags must remain fully functional once the roll bar is installed. The total weight of components removed must be less than the total weight of the components added during installation. Competitors are strongly cautioned to make the minimum amount of modification required to affix a given part and to not make unduly tortured interpretations of this rule. 2. Roll cages may be added. It is strongly recommended that roll cages be constructed according to the Club Racing GCR, though they must be bolted (not welded) into the automobile and be contained within the driver/passenger compartment. A roll cage has more than four attachment points to the body or frame or has bracing both fore and aft of the main hoop"

I'm only questioning things, because I believe there's a local member who is on the SEB or involved somehow. He looked at it and mentioned there's no way that's legal, etc. I then pulled up the exact rules for him to read (listed under Street class rules) and then seemingly took a step back. I simply want to know that I'm legal before running any national tours/etc this year. If there's no one on here that can confirm I'm OK by simply removing the rear seats to install this, please let me know who I can contact. I'll attach some pictures.

****The weight removed from the back seat/belts is quite a bit less than what this bar is adding.**** I'd estimate that I'm adding 20-25lbs by adding the bar and removing the rear seat/belts. Do I NEED to leave the rear seat belts in, even though I have no rear seat? To me even if I were be able to fit that seat in, it's useless for a person to ride in the back, coinciding with SCCA and their interpretation of Street/Street Touring being "street cars".

Thanks in advance.
Old Jan 2, 2024, 01:08 PM
  #37  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (36)
 
LV///R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: US
Posts: 1,538
Received 194 Likes on 115 Posts


Old Jan 2, 2024, 01:22 PM
  #38  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
Dallas J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Portland, Or
Posts: 5,806
Received 725 Likes on 567 Posts
Looks like SM/XA to me! Need some uprights?
The following users liked this post:
Butt Dyno (Jan 2, 2024)
Old Jan 2, 2024, 01:29 PM
  #39  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (36)
 
LV///R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: US
Posts: 1,538
Received 194 Likes on 115 Posts
Originally Posted by Dallas J
Looks like SM/XA to me! Need some uprights?
Could you expand on that please?! And you don't need to expand on the upright parts yet, lol!

Are you saying just because the seat is out, it would bump me? If I simply throw the seat back in and modify the seat so it fits with the bar, I'd be OK!?

Old Jan 2, 2024, 01:54 PM
  #40  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (10)
 
Butt Dyno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Why do they always call the Evo the Dark Side?
Posts: 1,681
Received 101 Likes on 50 Posts
Standard rollover hoops, covers, trim panels interior parts and rear seats may be removed or modified for clearance.
That sounds to me like what you are doing is legal.

Competitors are strongly cautioned to make the minimum amount of modification required to affix a given part and to not make unduly tortured interpretations of this rule.
This is some awful rules language. WTF does strongly cautioned mean when it says you can remove the rear seats for clearance previously?

Worst case you could find an old rear seat from some 200k wrecked car and hack it up.
The following users liked this post:
LV///R (Jan 2, 2024)
Old Jan 2, 2024, 02:05 PM
  #41  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (36)
 
LV///R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: US
Posts: 1,538
Received 194 Likes on 115 Posts
Originally Posted by Butt Dyno
That sounds to me like what you are doing is legal.



This is some awful rules language. WTF does strongly cautioned mean when it says you can remove the rear seats for clearance previously?

Worst case you could find an old rear seat from some 200k wrecked car and hack it up.
AGREED! The wording on this sucks - maybe they were thinking more so about 2 seater cars and not 4 doors. They could greatly simplify this by just saying the weight of the roll bar should be more than the weight removing to make it fit. That's just me though. I feel like what I've done so far is completely legal in STU...

EDIT - I also assume in regards to them even mentioning the part where the factory belts need to remain, they are reinforcing that the factory belts need to remain for the driver/pass seats, even if one adds in a 4/5/6 point racing harness. (Another silly rule in my opinion as well - why do we need 2 sets of belts in the car?) Maybe I'm missing something there....

Adding a 4 point to a 4 door car absolutely nullifies the use of that rear seat anyways. If they are truly trying to keep street/street touring cars "streetable", they have a conundrum there in itself. Driving a car with a 4 point / cage on the street isn't wise, yet they allow it? Contradictory IMO.


Last edited by LV///R; Jan 2, 2024 at 02:40 PM.
Old Jan 2, 2024, 04:21 PM
  #42  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
griceiv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: LA, CA
Posts: 1,574
Received 67 Likes on 54 Posts
I'm no longer on the SEB so I don't have to put any "non official" disclaimers anymore, but you should be ok with that setup in my opinion. I think you do need to keep the seatbelts. If want to get a more official opinion submit a clarification request to the STAC, https://www.soloeventsboard.com/

The reason for the silly wording is to prevent people from thinking they can do wild things and call it a roll bar. an open ended allowance to remove parts of the car to allow installation of custom made unconstrained parts makes people think crazy stuff. It's unfortunate there isn't a better way to communicate the intent of the rule to competitors/protest committees but it is what it is.
Old Jan 3, 2024, 06:00 AM
  #43  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (36)
 
LV///R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: US
Posts: 1,538
Received 194 Likes on 115 Posts
Originally Posted by griceiv
I'm no longer on the SEB so I don't have to put any "non official" disclaimers anymore, but you should be ok with that setup in my opinion. I think you do need to keep the seatbelts. If want to get a more official opinion submit a clarification request to the STAC, https://www.soloeventsboard.com/

The reason for the silly wording is to prevent people from thinking they can do wild things and call it a roll bar. an open ended allowance to remove parts of the car to allow installation of custom made unconstrained parts makes people think crazy stuff. It's unfortunate there isn't a better way to communicate the intent of the rule to competitors/protest committees but it is what it is.
Makes sense to me! Thanks for chiming in - as I was curious what your thoughts were. I have no issue throwing the seatbelts back in - it just looks weird to have no back seat, a roll bar and 3 useless seatbelts flopping around back there.

I did submit a letter to the SEB to get further clarification on this as well.

Old Jan 3, 2024, 07:54 AM
  #44  
Evolving Member
 
RobbieOh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: NSB, FL
Posts: 454
Received 115 Likes on 105 Posts
"Factory seatbelts and airbags must remain fully functional once the roll bar is installed." So, all other things considered, put the belts back in and you should be good to go. Which is dumb, bc you can remove the rear seat.... Maybe, put some velcro on them so they don't flop around
Old Jan 4, 2024, 06:41 AM
  #45  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (10)
 
Butt Dyno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Why do they always call the Evo the Dark Side?
Posts: 1,681
Received 101 Likes on 50 Posts
Originally Posted by griceiv
The reason for the silly wording is to prevent people from thinking they can do wild things and call it a roll bar. an open ended allowance to remove parts of the car to allow installation of custom made unconstrained parts makes people think crazy stuff. It's unfortunate there isn't a better way to communicate the intent of the rule to competitors/protest committees but it is what it is.
Ah that totally makes sense, since the alternative would be to strictly define what a roll bar is (though maybe that's sufficiently defined in one of the other classes?). I was not thinking srsbsns enough


Quick Reply: 2024 SCCA SOLO - STU Discussion



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:21 PM.